____________________________________________________
                                          
  Historical Facts
                      
                      Is Christmas Ranked as the Most
                      
                      Ungodly Celebration Ever?
                      
                      More People are Finally Discovering the Pagan
                      
                      Origins of Many Feasts Which Have Nothing to
                      
                      do With God.
                                            ____________________________________________________
              
                                                   Fred Zacaria | November 24, 2005 - Updated November 02, 2006

* Introduction.
I am and will always be a Roman Catholic (my certificate of baptism can be seen here www.zakaria.it/baptism.htm). In July 1989 when I accepted the Way the Truth and the Life (later on I will explain who that is), I started investigating if there is a God, because I was an agnostic Catholic, if He did reveal Himself, if He revealed Himself using His people to witness through a book or through other means, if the book was preserved from corruption through centuries. Then I asked what book was that? My research started by accepting by faith that the Bible was and is God's unchanged word, only after that I started comparing it in a critical, impartial and balanced way with other types of revelations (books). I was very open to change of mind and declaring "I was wrong" , becuase my soul was in the middle of the whole process. I then discovered that no man in history ever said that "The Way to heaven, the Truth in the Bible, the eternal Life was and is through Him" except for Him, Jesus Christ! So Jesus would have either been the greatest Liar and crook in human history or the Lord Himself ! I also used logic, instinct, mental hints and historical evidence to check that out through non christian historians of the time, as I wasn't there personally twenty centuries ago to witness the events. The result was and is: Yes Jesus is the Lord and the Bible is God's Word.

* The discovery of many strange truths.
Then, in 1991, I continued reading attentively the Word of God with an attitude of prayer, discovering many astounding thruths, one of them [just one of them developed in this article] was the complete absence of any of the popular celebrations held in the world since the advent of Christ.

* No mention of celebrations in the Word of God.

After a long period of deep thought, prayer, reflection and meditation combined with personal studies, I arrived to a crucial point in my personal belief :

Anything and everything in human's life must be measured by
the sole and only meter of the Word of God in
The Bible.

Having said that, what I noticed from a thorough reading of the Scripture (the Bible)was the total absence of the following :
1. No mention of Christmas celebration,
2. No mention of New Year celebration,
3. No mention of Easter celebration,
4. No mention even of Birthdays (I noticed from my personal study that only two persons [considered by God as evil]
   celebrated their birthday: the Pharaoh and Herod). I discovered that alone and not through the incitement of any cranky    sect (I'm still a Catholic!).
5. No mention of any religious festivity in the New Testament, such as Assumption Day commemoration on August 15, etc.
6. No mention of the above for the first three centuries by any of the early Christians.

* From the Catholic Encyclopedia.

Here are some excerpts from the Online Catholic Enclyclopedia
(between brackets are some notes by the author):

1. "Christmas was not among the earliest festivals of the Church. Irenaeus and Tertullian omit it from their lists of feasts [this and all following emphasis are from the author]; Origen, glancing perhaps at the discreditable imperial Natalitia, asserts that in the Scriptures sinners alone, not saints, celebrate their birthday; Arnobius ridiculed the "birthdays" of the gods."
2. "The first evidence of the feast is in Egypt. About A.D. 200, Clement of Alexandria says that certain Egyptian theologians "over curiously" assign, not the year alone, but the day of Christ's birth, placing it on 20 May in the twenty-eighth year of Augustus. This checks the so called correspondence between Cyril of Jerusalem (348-386) and Pope Julius I (337-352), to convert Armenia to 25 December. Cyril declares that his clergy cannot, on the single feast of Birth and Baptism, make a double procession to Bethlehem and Jordan. He asks Julius to assign the true date of the nativity "from census documents brought by Titus to Rome"; Julius assigns 25 December!"

(The author F.Zacaria [FZ] notes that in Rome the historical civil calendar had on the date 25 December always marked as "Die Natalis Sol Invictus" which meant "The Day of Birth [birthday] of the Invincible Sun"! A totally pagan holiday to worship the sun. It was also abbreviated as "Natalis Invicti".)
3. "Chrysostom in a crowded church in Antioch defended the pagan custom giving it a biblical inerpretation, in Feb 386 AD he said : "Besides, Zacaria of the New Testament who - as high priest - entered the Temple on the Day of Atonement, received therefore announcement of John's conception in September; six months later Christ was conceived, i.e. in March, and born accordingly in December."
(According to FZ this is a total stretching, because there is no evidence of the above mentioned periods, i.e. atonement, six months, conceived ...they are mere hypothesis).
4. "Concerning the date of Christ's birth the Bible in the New Testament gives no help. But logic can help us think that the census (a census is mentioned in that period) would have been impossible to be requested in winter: becuase a whole population could not then be put in motion. So the birth could not have been in winter; we also notice that only field labour was suspended. But Rome was not thus considerate. Authorities moreover differ as to whether shepherds could or would keep flocks exposed during the nights of the rainy season."
(FZ notes that the biblical account recounts of flocks being exposed during the night when they received the supernatural announcement, so it must have been any season except for winter!).
5. "Natalis Invicti. The well-known solar feast, however, of Natalis Invicti, celebrated on 25 December, has a strong claim on the responsibility for our December Christmas festivity. For the history of the solar cult, its position in the Roman Empire, and syncretism with Mithraism [my emphasis]."
(FZ notes here the very clear admission of historical facts influencing spiritual lives of millions of souls, instead of taking a step back from paganism, knowledgeable authorities play with fire: God forgives all sins except putting him equal to other gods which is blasphemy, see matthew 12:31 --- This photo on the right taken from a Mithraic art gallery shows the importance of the rising sun which starts gaining power again on the 24th of December onwards, the tree (christmas tree), the stars, the tree decoration and the round balls representing the sun on the tree! In another article the author will expose the Mithraicism belief, the ancient religion of Mithras in Persia, the god of light or sunlight, and the astounding similarities with christianity to the point of getting many intellectual "christians" give up christianity and become simply agnostics after having read the history of Mithra. FZ will - God willing - expose how the devil skillfully designed a perfect plan to deviate intelligent people, by inventing a religion very similar to what cenuries later would become known as christianity) .
6. "The earliest parallelism found between the births of Christ and the sun-god is in Cypri: "O quam pręclare providentia ut illo die quo natus est Sol . . . nasceretur Christus." Which means "O, how wonderfully acted Providence that on that day on which that Sun was born . . . Christ should be born.". But Tertullian had to assert that Sol was not the Christians' God; and Augustine denounced the heretical indentification of Christ with Sol."
(FZ: So we can see how early Christians clearly distanced themselves from this form of idolatry).

* The anglosaxon "Yule Day" has Mesopotamian origins!
In England, Christmas was forbidden by an Act of the Parliament in 1644; the day was to be a fast and a market day; shops were compelled to be open; plum puddings and mince pies condemned as heathen. The conservatives resisted; at Canterbury blood was shed; but after the Restoration dissenters continued to call Yuletide "Fooltide". The "Yule" has a Chaldean (Babylonian) origin, it means boy or lad. Even in ancient and modern arabic wecan sense the etymological development of the word which appears in contemporary sacred scriptures of the area: "lam yaled walam yulad" i.e. "wasn't born and wasn't generated". It is addressed to the boy "walad", lad in English! So in other words "Yule Day" goes back to the Babylonian era and has nothing to relate to Christmas, it was only united to it in recent history by the pagans (a pagan is anyone who doesn't profess Jesus as the only Saviour and His word as the Word of God). The above quote "wasn't born and wasn't generated" refers to denying the trinitarian nature of God, but it is very clear and visible in the Scripture, if analysed in its full context.

* The Roman Empire is still among us!
After that genuine period of fully living the Word (the first 2 centuries AD), the the roman empire became "Christian" because it couldn't defeat the threatening andgrowing underground "sect" (that's how the persecutors called true Christians hiding in the roman catacomb undergound tunnels). The true Christians were fighting (spiritually) against the pagan traditions of the time, so Emperor Costantine took off the Roman royal robes and put on a Roman priesthood robes declaring himself "I am a Christian" (this is a well known historical fact).
Unbelievable but true, his successors are still vividly living among us now and highly respected all around the world, with all their pagan festivities successfully transmitted down the line up to us. Costantine's false conversion to christianity was purely political, it was just to gain control and power over the underground Christians, he beautifully applied the proverb "If you can't beat them...join them!".

* No mention is no proof of prohibition.
Some argue that just because its not mentioned in the Bible it doesn't mean that it is prohibited. No where in the Word of God - the continue - it says that those festivities must not be celebrated. No where in the Bible is a prohibition of smoking, masturbation, abortion etc. (FZ answers through biblical verses to be inserted).

* Origins of Santa Claus.
Everyone knows that "San" comes from Latin "Santo" which means a "Saint". So we have for example: San Luis, San Antonio, San Francisco, San Diego, etc. it indicates a male name.
On the other hand "Santa" is the female counterpart of the same name, i.e. a female Saint. So we have for example: Santa Monica, Santa Barbara, Santa Maria, Santa Lucia etc.
No one will object that Nicole is a female name (or sometimes spelled Nichol), its origins are from Latin Nicolaus, so Claus derives from Nicolaus. At this point we have two conclusions regarding Santa Claus :

1. Santa is a female adjective !
2. Claus is a female name !

Question: How come Father Christmas known as a male "father" is wearing male garments having a beard, and not female garments? The author has made a research from different historical sources and found that the original (and also present Santa Clauses around the world) have typical feminine face characteristics, how is that explained? My research result is that in northern countries were Santa Claus personality originated there was a very strong social underground movement of women who had a burning desire to elevate their status not only to be equal to man but to locate themselves on top of man, it was a form of rebellion against God's order for humans (man and woman in the Word of God have equal dignity but with different roles, resulting as the man being the head of the family and not the woman). Women of that area of that precise period didnt like it (till now of course, and it expanded all over the globe), so they planned a suttle plot orchestrated through Satan... they invented a very tricky new tradition which he (the devil) would actively try promote all over the world in the next decades starting from that point of history. They invented the classic red clothes and wore it, different women in different countries in northern Europe in that period were all doing the same thing, all in red with a white beard, when - after a short period of time - the idea was accepted, especially by children, it became a custom; so they convinced their husbands, boyfriends, brothers, and any male to dress us in that way ... but they couldn't change the name, a female name! We can all see that he (Satan) was very successful in that. To confirm their success we have all seen hundreds of Santa Clauses dressed by women, young and beautiful girls in tv and everywhere, sometimes even in bikini and just with the red hat (see picture here on the left) and a beard. Now they can do that and the message is "We fooled you all". They promoted their rebellious idea. And to whoever would say that it was a male since the beginning (some attempt to prove it historically) these same evil women of the original idea would reply : "Yes he was a man with a female name becuase he liked men"! So again they won either ways in insulting and denigrating man, just out of disobedience to God's plan (i.e. the man is the head of the family and not the woman). So the above statement was a second message to the community promoting unions between similar sexes "Start To Prosper From Now". This practice is highly condemned by God and its a terrible condition also under the social point of view.

In more recent times some tried to disprove the fact that Santa Claus was a woman by affirming its origins deriving from "San Nicola" a male Saint in Italy, but that is a different strory all together and there is no historical proof or connection, it is just another attempt by the friends of the above mentioned north european women equivalent in latin countries. The adversary of God was able to insert in many dictionaries and encyclopedias the following information: Saint Nicholas comes from Greek name "Nikolaos" which meant "victory of the people" from Greek "nike" victory and "laos" people. Saint Nicholas was a 4th-century bishop from Anatolia who, according to legend, saved the daughters of a poor man from lives of prostitution. He is also known as Santa Claus (from Dutch Sinterklaas), the bringer of Christmas presents. He is the patron saint of children, sailors and merchants, and Greece and Russia. Nicholas was also the name of two czars of Russia and five popes. We can all note that some information is true, other is false - because the best kind of lie is the one mantled with many truths, so average readers or people (and even above average ones) can easily get swayed and confused.
Finally, If you ask where is the place (country or countries) on earth where women not only have equal rights but regarded as superior to men, well there is a spot, and if you ask where on earth people belonging to the same sex loving each other are highly regarded as socially equal to others with same rights if not more? Yes, its the same spot, over there …up north, where the message "Start To Prosper" took origin. Thanks for the gift ...Santa Claus!

* Origin of Fireworks.
The search is still being made by the author. Anyway up to now, my research has showed that from real ancient times (ancient Egypt, Greece, Rome, and especially China and India) men and women celebrated the winter solstice (the sun-god) as the growing sun gaining power from December 21 by starting small fires in the villages, towns, cities, all over the world. Small fires to heat and protect them from winter cold weather yes that was one reason, but the main reason was to give the sun a hand ! To push the sun, to help the sun to climb and become more powerful, it was a divine ritual in order to help him, through fire ignition. The most advanced people with fire works, well before the christian era, were the chinese and then after that the indians, but other people around the world were also very keen. Yes it was China who invented beautiful fire works centuries ago, they were exported or a better word of that age "transported" all over the world, and also copied and produced in various countries. It is important to remember that fireworks started from December 21 onwards to push the sun in its heating and lighting power. In modern times, and since the Roman calendar started, the top night was (and is, as we all know) December 31.
Under a Christian point of view buying and consuming fire works is bad because it is cooperating with a tradition far from what God wants, i.e. the sun-god who is another god, some might think "well we're just having some fun", God's answer is : No! He doesn't like that, and He is jealous (see the first comandment), no one is to be put on His level. The sun is a creation of God, the sun is not the creator. So don't buy fireworks anymore (i hope no one from the firework industry reads this!only joking). Fireworks are harmful for your soul (you won't burn in hell if you do buy them, because if you believe in Jesus as your only Saviour you are saved by faith anyway), but buying them is harmful to your soul because behindeach firework hides a demon who will wisper in your ear more rebellious ideas against God and His Word … besides, you could also harm yourself and others fisically (every year thousands of people around the world get injured by them and many even die. In Italy - for example - an average of 80 people each year are injured). The picture hereon the left we can see a picture of commonly used round ball, used for decoration, usually put on the Christmas trees ... its nothing else but a devilish represantion of the sun-god! It is directly connected to fireworks.

* Origin of the Christmas tree & the Christmas star on top of it.

Research is being made, its a long story! Anyway the word of God in Jeremiah 10:2/5 very clearly condemns it. Here's what our Creator says : God demands from whoever says believes in Him :

1. Not to follow what the majority of the world do "Do not follow the way of the heathen"

2.Do not put trust in human religious customs "Customs of people are vain".

3.Do not decorate a tree with silver or golden decorations giving it a religious meaning "Don't deck the tree with silver and with gold"

4.Do not bow or knee in front of the tree (I did it for years when I was a small boy, in front of baby Jesus, and all my gifts to be opened on December 25th after lunch!), do not give the tree or all the sorrounding a spiritual realm because "its the work of the hand of a workman, and it doesn't move". The Christmas tree is considered an idol, which people put it at the same level of God "their idols cannot speak... there is none like unto thee o God". Unbelievable right? You don't believe me? Check your Bible for yourself. Some people, wispered by the Devil would say "Oh don't be silly, that verse doesn't mean the Christmas tree, December 24 was yes a pagan holiday but they didn't mean to worship the sun, they just venerated it and were amazed by it, the sun was all their life, heat-light-everything till now, so they just admired an emanation of God, a creation of God, they didn't consider it God in person." Well, that's untrue, many populations around the world in the past, and in the present time do worship the sun and admit it openly. The Word of God clearly states if anyone admires the creation without witnessing about the Creator is not on the Creator's side, he or she is on the opposite side, the Devil's side. God says : "He that is not with me is against me."(Matthew 12:30). Regarding the star on top of it, you won't believe your eyes when you'll read its satanic origin...watch this space soon!

* Why no references and bibliography?
The author will seldom provide in any of his articles references to persons, places or bibliography because he considers he values the post modern method of writing applied to the new era of internet system does not require that. Here is the reason: by just typing any key word or statement (in this or other articles) into a respectable search engine it will be able to find huge amounts of documentation, articles, essays, books, comments that will both prove and/or disprove what anyone is saying! So the solution is just to pick up our own minds, pray about it to be guided by our Creator and go ahead, each one with his own idea, knowing that relativism is the enemy of truth, and the truth is not divisible.

* Epilogue.
Having said all that, and because we're living in a world where the majority is following a certain pattern, it would be impossible to beat the majority (from the beggar to the president of any race and/or colour) so it would be rational, reasonable and pragmatic to do what the above mentioned Emperor did, i.e. join the majority! Lot was a believer but he was a weak believer, maybe both of us are the same!
Salvation is through faith and not through works, celebrating or not celebrating a pagan feast will not lead to hell as long as a persone puts his trust in the only Saviour and refuses to bow to other gods (sun-god ot others). So do I celebrate Christmas or New Year or my Birthday? Well, I can assure you that on Christmas eve around 10pm I'm happilly sleeping, same on December 31, same on the night of my birthday! Why? Answer: none of the biblical personalities or leaders or simple believers did, so why should I ! I've never set a Christmas tree or any of the decorations, and never wish Merry Christmas to anyone, but when someone wishes me a Merry Christmas or Happy New Year or Happy Easter I thank them and say likewise, I exchange gifts when someone announce he/she has a gift for me (I do the same, as any occasion is suitable to express the love of God). So what can we do about it? Think of Lot, we're in the same situation. But at least I (you) are now informed about what Christmas really is. So my final word is: if you wish me Merry Christmas and Happy New Year i'll say [to be incoherent, for a change!] :

and !